Is Cycling Good for Weight Loss? What to Know
Jason Nista
Exercises & Fitness
12/26/2025 7:37am
7 minute read
Quick Answer: Yes, cycling is excellent for weight loss. Aim for 150-300 minutes per week of riding, combine it with a modest calorie deficit and strength training twice weekly, and you'll see real reductions in body fat and waist size. Cycling's low-impact nature means you can ride longer and more often than higher-impact exercises—making it easier to stay consistent.
Why Cycling Works for Weight Loss
Cycling burns significant calories while being gentle on your joints, which is exactly the combination most people need for sustainable weight loss. Unlike running, where impact forces can sideline you with knee or hip pain, cycling lets you rack up hours of cardio without beating up your body.
The calorie burn is substantial too. A 150-pound person riding at a moderate pace (12-14 mph) burns roughly 570 calories per hour. Bump that up to 180 pounds, and you're looking at nearly 690 calories. Add some hills or intervals, and those numbers climb even higher. Over weeks and months, this adds up to real fat loss—especially when paired with sensible eating.
Research supports this. Studies consistently show that 150-300 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise leads to meaningful reductions in body fat and waist circumference. Indoor cycling specifically has been shown to improve body composition, with even stronger results when combined with dietary changes.
For a deeper dive into how exercise fits into a complete weight loss strategy, our Complete Exercise Guide for Weight Loss covers the full science of training for fat loss.
How Many Calories Does Cycling Burn?
The calories you burn cycling depend on two main factors: how fast you're going and how much you weigh. Here's a breakdown based on metabolic equivalents (METs) from exercise research:
| Speed / Effort | 150 lb | 180 lb | 200 lb |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 10 mph (leisure) | ~286 | ~343 | ~381 |
| 10–12 mph | ~486 | ~583 | ~648 |
| 12–14 mph | ~572 | ~686 | ~762 |
| 14–16 mph | ~714 | ~857 | ~953 |
| 16–19 mph (vigorous) | ~857 | ~1,029 | ~1,143 |
Keep in mind that terrain, wind, bike fit, and your fitness level all affect actual calorie burn. These numbers give you a solid baseline to plan around, but don't obsess over precision—focus on being consistent and gradually increasing your effort over time.
A Simple Weekly Cycling Plan for Weight Loss
The most effective approach combines different types of rides rather than doing the same thing every day. Here's a sustainable template that works for most people:
Two interval sessions per week (20-30 minutes each): These are your intensity days. After a warm-up, alternate between hard efforts and recovery—something like 6-8 rounds of 1 minute hard followed by 2 minutes easy. These sessions build fitness quickly and boost your metabolism.
One longer steady ride per week (60-90 minutes): This should feel conversational—hard enough to be working, but you could still chat with a friend. These longer sessions build your aerobic base and burn significant calories without taxing your recovery.
Two strength training sessions per week (20-30 minutes each): Don't skip this. Resistance training preserves muscle mass while you're losing fat, which keeps your metabolism healthy and improves how you'll look and feel at your goal weight. Focus on compound movements: squats, deadlifts or hip hinges, pushing movements, pulling movements, and core work.
This adds up to roughly 150-250 minutes of cycling plus strength work—right in the sweet spot for fat loss without burning yourself out.
Cycling vs. Running: Which Is Better for Fat Loss?
Running does burn more calories per minute than cycling at comparable effort levels. But that's not the whole story.
Cycling's lower impact means many people can ride for longer durations and more days per week without breaking down. A 60-minute bike ride is often more manageable than a 60-minute run, especially if you're carrying extra weight or have joint issues. Over time, those extra sustainable minutes can add up to more total calories burned—even if the per-minute rate is lower.
Research comparing the two shows that when total energy expenditure is matched, both cycling and running produce similar improvements in body composition. Some studies suggest running may have a slight edge for abdominal fat specifically, but the differences are small. The best exercise for weight loss is ultimately the one you'll actually do consistently.
Fueling Your Rides Without Sabotaging Your Progress
One of the biggest traps cyclists fall into is "reward eating"—finishing a ride and thinking, "I earned this" before consuming more calories than they just burned. The solution isn't to starve yourself, but to plan your nutrition so you're fueled for performance without undoing your hard work.
Before morning rides, something light and carb-focused works well—a small portion of overnight oats provides quick energy without sitting heavy in your stomach. After rides, prioritize protein to support muscle recovery, along with some carbs to replenish glycogen. A breakfast sandwich or protein PB&J hits this balance well.
The bigger picture matters most. If you're riding regularly and want to lose weight, you still need a modest calorie deficit. Our Weight Loss Meal Plan takes the guesswork out of this—pre-portioned meals with the right macros so your rides don't end in "I'm starving" takeout decisions. Pairing structured eating with your cycling routine is where the real results come from.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is cycling good for weight loss?
Yes—especially when you ride consistently (150-300 minutes per week) and maintain a modest calorie deficit. Research shows regular aerobic exercise at this volume leads to meaningful reductions in body fat and waist circumference.
How many minutes should I cycle per week?
Build toward 150-300 minutes per week. Start where you are and increase gradually. More minutes generally mean more fat loss, but a realistic schedule you'll actually keep matters more than an ambitious plan you'll abandon.
Should I do intervals or long steady rides?
Both help, and a mix is ideal. Intervals build fitness and intensity quickly, while longer easy rides add volume without crushing your recovery. A good template is 2 interval sessions plus 1 longer ride per week.
Is cycling better than running for weight loss?
Running burns more calories per minute, but cycling is lower impact and often easier to sustain for longer sessions. When total calories are matched, both produce similar body composition improvements. Choose what you'll stick with.
Do I need strength training too?
Yes—two or more days per week of resistance training helps preserve muscle while you're losing fat, which improves your metabolism and long-term weight maintenance. Even short sessions make a real difference.
The Bottom Line
Cycling is one of the best exercises for weight loss precisely because it's sustainable. You can ride more often and longer than many other activities without wearing yourself down, and those accumulated hours translate to real fat loss over time.
The formula is straightforward: aim for 150-300 minutes of riding per week, include some intervals for intensity, add strength training twice weekly to preserve muscle, and pair it all with sensible eating. You don't need the "perfect" plan—you need a realistic one you'll actually follow.
Ready to make your nutrition as consistent as your riding? Explore our meal plans to fuel your cycling without the guesswork.
Related Articles
Is Running Good for Weight Loss? What Actually Works
9 minute read
How to Lose Weight Quickly and Safely: 14-Day Plan
10 minute read
What Is Moderate Exercise? Heart Rate Zones Explained
9 minute read